hiltbuilder.blogg.se - Evidence based decision making example

Evidence based decision making example download#

This is where the idea of “evidence-based” decision making becomes central. Even if the data itself is reliable, how that data is used remains a key consideration. Having looked at objective data, it is still far too easy and common to posit unproven theories to explain the data, identify causes, and predict future outcomes. However, there is a way to do this that still leaves far too much room for error. Using objective facts as the supporting basis for decisions seems like a sensible approach. Explain the uses of descriptive and predictive analytics.Explain evidence-based decision making.

Evidence based decision making example download#

Read moreĬlick here to download a description of the EBDM Initiative and its Phases.

\” Phase VI Implementation Process: In September 2016, NIC announced its decision to support at varying levels EBDM teams in all three states during Phase VI of the initiative.

Phase V Statewide Planning Phase: In November 2014, Indiana, Virginia, and Wisconsin were selected to work in partnership with NIC as part of Phase V to advance criminal justice system outcomes throughout communities in their states.

Phase IV Expansion to Statewide Structure: Starting in 2013, NIC shifted its focus to replicating the EBDM framework on a statewide level in order to demonstrate its value beyond single, local jurisdictions.

Phase III Implementation: Since August 2011, NIC has provided support to all seven sites in Phase III.

Their implementation plans were submitted to NIC in June 2011 Read more

Phase II Planning Process: The initiative competitively selected and worked with seven sites as they engaged in a planning process to prepare to implement their local interpretation of the Framework.

Phase I Framework Development: Project partners worked with NIC and a multidisciplinary advisory committee to develop the EBDM initiative\’s guiding document, A Framework for Evidence-Based Decision Making in Local Criminal Justice Systems (\”the Framework\”), with the intent to define risk and harm reduction as fundamental goals of the justice system, summarize the strongest of the evidence-based research, and outline a structure and set of principles for achieving EBDM in local justice systems.

There are six phases of the EBDM initiative:

The initiative seeks to equip criminal justice policymakers on the state level and in local communities with the information, processes, and tools that will result in measurable reductions of pretrial misconduct, post-conviction reoffending, and other forms of community harm resulting from crime.

This effort is grounded in two decades of research on the factors that contribute to criminal reoffending and the methods the justice system can employ to interrupt the cycle of reoffense. The goal of this initiative is to build a systemwide framework (arrest through final disposition and discharge) that will result in more collaborative evidence-based decision making and practices in state and local criminal justice systems. In 2013, the initiative broadened its reach and became the Evidence-Based Decision Making in State and Local Criminal Justice Systems Initiative. In June 2008, the National Institute of Corrections (NIC) awarded the Center for Effective Public Policy, in partnership with the Pretrial Justice Institute, the Justice Management Institute, and The Carey Group, a cooperative agreement to launch the Evidence-Based Decision Making (EBDM) in Local Criminal Justice Systems Initiative. County commissioners and executives fund programs that research demonstrates to be effective in reducing offender risk, and they eliminate programs that research has proven to be ineffective.Jailers assign offenders to skill-building programs and community corrections officials assign offenders to supervision levels based upon risk and needs assessments.Prosecutors, defenders, and judges use defendant risk information to determine if pretrial release supervision is appropriate, and they use offender need assessment data to establish post-conviction release conditions.Law enforcement uses objective data to inform the cite/release decision.Some examples of EBDM include the following: \”Evidence-based decision making\” (EBDM) is the practice of using research findings to inform or guide decisions across the justice system.